The letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities and must be submitted prior to an award being issued. NSF may consider the following factors, where relevant and consistent with applicable laws and regulations, in determining the appropriate consequences for violations of disclosure requirements: Prior to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the guidelines established in Part I of the PAPPG or the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. [45], Special Instructions for the Preparation and Submission of CLB Supplemental Funding Requests. See 2 CFR 200.431 for the definition and allowability of inclusion of fringe benefits on a proposal budget. (i) Name: Enter the name of the primary organization of the senior person. A collaborative proposal is one in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project. Specific instructions for each type of request are provided below. If the State/Province is not applicable, enter N/A. Cambridge, MA 02138
Conference Facilities. If the proposers usual accounting practices provide that its contributions to employee benefits (leave, employee insurance, social security, retirement, other payroll-related taxes, etc.) The PI may conduct preliminary or conceptual work that does not involve human subjects while the protocol is being developed or is under review, consistent with organizational guidelines. When mandatory cost sharing is included on Line M, and accepted by the Foundation, the commitment of funds becomes legally binding and is subject to audit. (See Chapter II.D.2.f(vi)(e) for additional instructions on preparation of this type of proposal.). A co-PI on a new proposal should designate the PI as the substitute negotiator. *Source of Support: Identify the entity for each proposal and/or award that is providing the support. Advance coordination should minimize disruption of the research. OVERLAP. The following sections are required for a collaborative proposal submitted by: See Chapter II.D.2.i for additional guidance on the mentoring and data management plan requirements for collaborative proposals. As part of the proposal preparation and submission process, all senior personnel identified on a proposal are required to submit information to assist reviewers and program staff in making informed recommendations and funding decisions. Prospective recipients should contact their local government or a Federally-insured financial institution to determine what areas are identified as having special flood hazards and the availability of flood insurance in their community. endstream
endobj
189 0 obj
<. If the State/Province is not applicable, enter N/A. %%EOF
[42] Guidelines to the use of Wild Birds in Research; Guidelines of the American Society of Mammologists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research; Guidelines for the Use of Fishes in Research; and Guidelines for the Use of Live Amphibians and Reptiles in Field and Laboratory Research. See Chapter IV.D.2.b. *Statement of Potential Overlap: Provide a description of the potential overlap with any current or pending in-kind contribution and this proposal in terms of scope . Acceptable products must be citable and accessible, including but not limited to: Only the list of ten will be used in the review of the proposal. RAISE awards are not eligible for renewal. 3729-3733 and 3802. As this is a primary concern of Federal agencies, please be clear in your explanations. for additional information on Single Copy Documents. A conference proposal should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the scheduled date. Career-Life Balance supplemental funding to existing awards may be requested as described below: Research award recipients may request supplemental funding: To support additional personnel (e.g., a technician or research assistant) to sustain research when the PI, co-PI, or other member of the senior personnel is on family leave for either primary dependent care responsibilities or other direct family considerations; and. National Science Foundation (NSF) Jamie Sprague. The budget justification must be no more than five pages per proposal. biologics, chemical, model systems, technology, etc.). This will aid in determining the appropriateness of the work for consideration under this type of proposal. Find instructions and blank format pages below. The Ideas Lab concept incorporates a "guided creativity" process, thus the use of a facilitator(s) is included, both to guide the creation of interdisciplinary teams and the creative development of ideas, and to ensure that the workshop progresses in a productive manner. NSF will not fund research that would be considered to lead to a gain of function of agents associated with the U.S. Government Policy on DURC (See also Chapter XI.B.5 for additional information.) Reference information is required. (iii) *Position Title: Enter the current position title of the senior person. The email confirming approval to submit a EAGER proposal must be uploaded by the prospective PI in the Program Officer Concurrence Email section of Research.gov. A computing device is considered a supply if the acquisition cost is less than the lesser of the capitalization level established by the proposer or $5,000, regardless of the length of its useful life. Proposal Budget and Budget Justification: A budget and budget justification for the operation, maintenance, and administration of the proposed equipment (Chapter II.D.2.f should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). For some educational projects conducted at local school districts, the participants being trained are employees. One individual must be designated as PI. The project title will be preceded by the prefix RAPID:. The location of the nearest APHIS Regional Office, as well as information concerning this and other APHIS activities, are available on the APHIS website. These requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal, including supplementary documentation. See Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on Concept Outlines. Misrepresentations and/or omissions may be subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. Proposers are advised not to exceed the mandatory cost sharing level or amount specified in the solicitation.[25]. However, inclusion of a subaward or contract in the proposal budget or submission of a request after issuance of an NSF award to add a subaward or contract will document the required organizational determination. See Chapter II.E.9 for additional information. Development and/or refinement of research tools, Computation methodologies and algorithms for problem-solving, Development of databases to support research and education, Broadening the participation of groups underrepresented in STEM, Service to the scientific and engineering community outside of the individuals immediate organization, Listing of organization for which the individual as served as a review, All active and pending grants, whether or not they are based at Harvard, Internal awards in direct support of a research project, In-kind resources (e.g. NSF will not forward the detailed information to reviewers and will hold it privileged to the extent permitted by law. For Concept Outlines that must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool. other products, such as data, databases, or datasets, physical collections, audio or video products, software, models, educational aids or curricula, instruments or equipment, research material, interventions (e.g., clinical or educational), or new business creation. In this section, disclose ALL[35] in-kind contributions related to current and pending support. Person-month information included in current and pending support may differ from the person-months By signing the certification pages, AORs for prospective recipients located in FEMA-designated special flood hazard areas are certifying that adequate flood insurance has been or will be obtained in the following situations: (1) for NSF awards for the construction of a building or facility, regardless of the dollar amount of the award; and. Centers are not considered research infrastructure but will often use research infrastructure to meet their objectives. PIs should consult their organizations SPO for unusual situations (e.g., a long lead time for procurement) that create problems regarding the proposed start date. (b) Senior personnel include the individuals designated by the proposer/awardee organization and approved by NSF who contribute in a substantive, meaningful way to the scientific development or execution of a research and development project proposed to be carried out with a research and development award.[31]. (c) Current and Pending (Other) Support must be provided separately for each individual designated as senior personnel through use of SciENcv. Organizations must identify their status by checking all the applicable boxes on the Cover Sheet: For-profit organizations must be U.S.-based commercial organizations, including small businesses, with strong capabilities in scientific or engineering research or education and a passion for innovation. NOTE: The National Science Foundation released an updated Proposal and Award . If external review is to be obtained, then the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. To qualify for support, however, attendance at meetings or conferences must be necessary to accomplish proposal objectives or disseminate research results. *Statement of Potential Overlap : CPS- 16 of 27. New version: NSF PAPPG (NSF 23-1) (NSF website) will be effective for submissions due on or after January 30, 2023. All requests for CLB supplemental funding support must be submitted by using the Supplemental Funding Request function in Research.gov and must be adequately justified. The RAISE proposal type must be selected in the proposal preparation module in Research.gov. Organizations without a current negotiated indirect cost rate agreement and that wish to request indirect cost rate recovery above 10% should prepare an indirect cost proposal based on expenditures for its most recently ended fiscal year. Such requests should include a brief description of the proposed activity, a budget, and a budget justification, in addition to items (ii)-(iv) above. If a decision is made to fund the proposal,the individual must provide a signed copy of the official IACUC approval letter (which includes the items specified above) to the cognizant NSF Program Officer before an award can be issued. The following information regarding collaborators and other affiliations (COA) must be separately provided for each individual identified as senior personnel on the project. If a decision is made to fund the proposal, and use of a select agent as identified by the Policy is proposed, the proposer must submit evidence of registration of the select agent with the CDC or USDA as required by the Select Agent Regulations. Within seven to fourteen calendar days following the Ideas Lab, the NSF Program Officers will determine which project ideas are meritorious and should be invited as full proposals. Compensation classified as salary payments must be requested in the salaries and wages category. While not required, the following format may be used in preparation of letters of collaboration: "If the proposal submitted by Dr. [insert the full name of the Principal Investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal.". (NOT-OD-18-197 includes detailed guidance about resubmissions and overlap.) This may include: *Note: Other Support is sometimes referred to as Current and Pending Support or Current and Pending (Other) Support. For research infrastructure that is mobile or geographically distributed, information for the primary site or organizational headquarters (as defined by the proposer) should be provided. Consultants travel costs, including subsistence, may be included. Compensation for time normally spent on research within the term of appointment is deemed to be included within the faculty members regular organizational salary. Current and Pending Support: Chapter II.D.2.h(ii) should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. This type of proposal normally competes with proposals for research or education projects.[48]. At least one industrial participant must be included in the GOALI activity and must be specified in the GOALI-Industrial PI Confirmation Letter. We will help you determine where your CAREER proposal fits within your larger strategic plan for your research, and how to use the story of your potential career trajectory compellingly for this proposal. Refer to the frequently asked questions on the COA template page for additional information. Chapter II.D.2.g must be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. National Science Foundation (NSF) Current and Pending Support. The Project Description should provide a clear statement of the work to be undertaken and must include the objectives for the period of the proposed work and expected significance; the relationship of this work to the present state of knowledge in the field, as well as to work in progress by the PI under other support. (See also PAPPG Chapter I.E for additional information.). Proposers should describe only those resources that are directly applicable. [24] Inclusion in the Budget Justification also meets this definition. NSF does not negotiate rates for organizations that are not direct recipients of NSF funding (e.g., subrecipients). 206 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<47D6F02EB3AA6A448CF374C72CA5ABFD><3692A1E9B65448419617A6DDF4F4EA90>]/Index[188 27]/Info 187 0 R/Length 93/Prev 168653/Root 189 0 R/Size 215/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream
If the subaward organization is changed, prior approval of the new subaward organization must be obtained from the cognizant NSF Grants and Agreements Officer. Further, if an individual receives direct or indirect support that is funded by a foreign government-sponsored talent recruitment program, even where the support is provided through an intermediary and does not require membership in the foreign government-sponsored talent recruitment program, that support must be disclosed. The following provides guidance regarding the preparation, review, or administration of EAGER proposals/awards: The Project Description is expected to be brief and must be no more than eight pages. General purpose equipment such as office equipment and furnishings, and information technology equipment and systems are typically not eligible for direct cost support. ), i. Requests may be for up to $200K (including indirect costs) and up to one year in duration. It is expected, however, that the cost (including equipment adaptation and installation) will not be a major component of the total proposed budget for the project. The number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on the proposal budget. (iii) All components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date, and failure to do so may result in the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review. 3729-3733 and 3802. In some instances, Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. In addition, the proposer must submit a justification demonstrating how the potential benefits of the research far outweigh the risks. See Chapter IV.B for additional information. 287, 1001, 1031 and 31 U.S.C. The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) provides high-performance computing resources for NSF-funded researchers in atmospheric and related sciences. This includes, but is not limited to, information related to current, pending, and other support (both foreign and domestic) as defined in 42 U.S.C. The amount for indirect costs must be calculated by applying the current negotiated indirect cost rate(s) to the approved base(s), and such amounts must be specified in the budget justification. The description should be narrative in nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information. Centers focus on integrative learning and discovery and demonstrate leadership in broadening participation through focused investments in a diverse set of partner organizations and individuals. Research Advanced by Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering (RAISE), 5. The Current & Pending (C&P) Tool does not save manual entries within the tool itself (e . Travel, meal, and hotel expenses of recipient employees who are not on travel status are unallowable. If additional time beyond the awarded period of performance end date is necessary to complete the statement of work, and exceptional circumstances warrant, a formal request must be submitted to NSF via . *Statement of Potential Overlap: Provide a description of the potential overlap with any current or pending in-kind contribution and this proposal in terms of scope, budget, or person . To support additional personnel (e.g., a technician or research assistant) to sustain research while a postdoctoral researcher or graduate student being supported by NSF on the award is on family leave for either primary dependent care responsibilities or other direct family considerations. Total award amount for the entire award period covered (including indirect costs), Number of person-months per year to be devoted by the individual, brief statement of the overall objectives of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution must be provided, summary of the potential overlap between this proposal and any active or pending proposal or in-kind contribution, Additional details can be found on the NSF, Exporting Current Outside Activities from OAIR (Harvard provided PDF), Exporting Data Use Agreements from the DUA module (Harvard provided PDF), All Harvard individuals who are designated as Key Personnel on an NSF award/subaward are required to report all their research support to NSF via the Current and Pending Support form, which is required at JIT and with each RPPR if their support has changed since the last submission. These project ideas typically will be high-risk/high-impact, as they represent new and unproven ideas, approaches and/or technologies. In the interim, proposers must continue to meet the guidance specified in PAPPG Chapter IX.B. NSF prior approval is necessary if the objectives or scope of the project change. The cost of computer services, including computer-based retrieval of scientific, technical, and educational information, may be requested only where it is institutional policy to charge such costs as direct charges. [35] See the table entitled, NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance Pre- and Post-award Disclosures Relating to the Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending (Other) Support for instructions on in-kind support for use on the project being proposed. All of the individuals Ph.D. thesis advisees. Working with the PI or Key Personnel to complete their Biosketch and Current and Pending Support. Proposal Budget and Budget Justification: A budget and budget justification for the travel prepared in accordance with Chapter II.D.2.f. The sections described below represent the body of a research proposal submitted to NSF. Applicants also must include a Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending Support information (both of which must be prepared in accordance with standard NSF formatting guidelines). If there is no overlap, then enter N/A in the field. NSF requires a separate biosketch generated by Science Experts Network Curriculum Vitae (SciENcv) (NIH website) for each individual identified as senior personnel. The NIH Grants Policy Statement, 2.5.1 . (45CFR46.102(l)). See also PAPPG Chapters II.F.8 and II.F.11 for additional information on proposal certifications. biologics, chemical, model systems, technology, etc.). The following categories of unallowable costs are highlighted because of their sensitivity: Costs of entertainment, amusement, diversion and social activities, and any costs directly associated with such activities (such as tickets to shows or sporting events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation, and gratuities) are unallowable. (viii) Research Involving Field Experiments with Genetically Engineered Organisms. [6] Macintosh users also may use Helvetica and Palatino fonts. A proposal submitted for this purpose must contain the elements identified below, with particular attention to plans for composition and recruitment of the travel group. Do not submit any personal information in the Biographical Sketch. As a general policy, NSF limits the salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. (v) In order for NSF to comply with Federal Environmental Statutes (including, but not limited to, the National Environmental Policy Act (42 USC 4321, et seq. *Status of Support: Select the appropriate status type as defined below: Proposal/Award Number (if available): Enter the applicable proposal/award number for each proposal and/or award, if available. *Note: Other Support is sometimes referred to as Current and Pending (Other) Support. Any project proposing use of live vertebrate animals for research or education must comply with the provision in the PHS Assurance for Institutional Commitment (Section II) that requires the submitting organization to establish and maintain a program for activities involving animals in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide). (f) Do not submit any personal information in the Current and Pending (Other) support. EAGER is a type of proposal used to support exploratory work in its early stages on untested, but potentially transformative, research ideas or approaches. Some governments require nonresidents to obtain official approval to carry out investigations within their borders and coastal waters under their jurisdiction. NSF also will not fund research that involves the creation, transfer, or use of enhanced PPPs except under special circumstances where the potential benefits to society far outweigh the risks and all other conditions of the Policy are met. (iv) If the project lacks definite plans regarding use of human subjects, their data or their specimens, pursuant to 45 CFR 690.118, the proposer must check the box for "Human Subjects" on the Cover Sheet and enter Pending in the space provided for the approval date. This includes, for example, Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED), Research Opportunity Awards (ROAs), Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs), Facilitating Research at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (RUIs), Research Experiences for Veterans (REV), and Research Experiences for Teachers, and Research Experiences for Graduates. [31] In accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior personnel typically do not include graduate students. [10] See Chapter II.F. All proposals must be received by the deadline date specified in the NSF funding opportunity. NSF supports conferences in special areas of science and engineering that bring experts together to discuss recent research or education findings or to expose other researchers or students to new research and education techniques. Please use the links listed below for more information on each submitting offices deadline policies: Informational Training Module (Harvard HTP course), SciENcv tutorials (Harvard HTP course bundle), OSP: Preparing a Proposal (Harvard Website), HMS ORA: Proposal Development (Harvard Website), HSPH SPA: NSF Submissions (Harvard Website). Learn more about the project, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG), Academic Technology Transfer and Commercialization of University Research, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Budget, Performance and Financial Reporting, NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG), Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 23-1), Chapter II: Proposal Preparation Instructions, For each proposal that proposes to conduct research off-campus or off site, the AOR must complete a certification that the organization has a plan in place, It is NSF policy (see Chapter XI.A.1.g.) If the project involves human subjects and is to be performed outside of the U.S., evidence of IRB approval is required. If an LOI was submitted, enter the LOI ID number that was issued upon submission. [16] Travel, meal, and hotel expenses of recipient employees who are not on travel status are unallowable. RAISE is a type of proposal that may be used to support bold, interdisciplinary projects whose: Scientific advances lie in great part outside the scope of a single program or discipline, such that substantial funding support from more than one program or discipline is necessary. Reviewers will evaluate the information during the merit review process and the cognizant NSF Program Officer will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency. Chapter II.D.2.g should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. Proposers also should enter the country/countries with which project participants will engage and/or travel to attend international conferences. If the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter Worldwide. Letters of collaboration should be limited to stating the intent to collaborate and should not contain endorsements or evaluation of the proposed project. (See also Chapter II.F.7.) See additional information on NSF Disclosure Requirements in Chapter II.B. The approval letter must be provided to the cognizant NSF Program Officer before an award can be issued. Chapter II.D.2.h(ii) must be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. Applicants are notified electronically of NSFs decision regarding whether they are invited or not invited to participate in the Ideas Lab. [42] Departures from the Guide must be approved by the IACUC and based on scientific, veterinary, medical, or animal welfare issues (for more information, see Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) Departures from the Guide). Effective 10/04/2021 NSF CURRENT AND PENDING SUPPORT OMB-3145-0058 * PI/co-PI/Senior Personnel Name: *Required fields Note: NSF has provided 15 project/proposal and 10 in-kind contribution entries for users to . We're completely revamping our site and were doing it in the open so you can check on our progress. List names as last name, first name, middle initial, for whom a personal, family, or business relationship would otherwise preclude their service as a reviewer. List of the individuals undergraduate and graduate education as well as postdoctoral and fellowship training. Proposers should not submit the plan to NSF for review. If the primary purpose is to speak or assist with management of the conference, then such costs should be budgeted in appropriate categories other than participant support. Items of needed equipment must be adequately justified, listed individually by description and estimated cost. Government-wide certifications and representations are provided by the proposer on an annual basis in SAM (see PAPPG Chapter I.G.2). A proposer interested in submitting a GOALI proposal or a GOALI supplemental funding request to an existing NSF-funded award must contact the cognizant NSF Program Officer listed in the relevant funding opportunity prior to submission. EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER), 4. These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. Information on other support assists awarding agency staff in the identification and resolution of potential overlap of support. The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity. Any substantial collaboration with individuals not included in the budget should be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal (see Chapter II.D.2.g) and documented in a letter of collaboration from each collaborator. The Other Support download and GMAS resources were originally developed to assist with NIH Other Support disclosures and may be used as a resource for NSF Current and Pending (Other) Support. Funds may be requested for field work, attendance at meetings and conferences, and other travel associated with the proposed work, including subsistence. The specific nature, purpose and need for such equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the Project Description to permit evaluation of the request by knowledgeable reviewers. No appendices or supplementary documents may be submitted. The school district must have an accounting mechanism in place (i.e., sub-account code) to differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments. If there is no potential overlap, enter N/A in this field. The award size, however, will be consistent with the project scope and of a size comparable to grants in similar areas. Be issued this section, disclose all [ 35 ] in-kind contributions related Current... Strategies are integrated in the NSF funding ( e.g., subrecipients ) typically do not the! Researchers in Atmospheric and related sciences PAPPG Chapter I.G.2 ) the primary organization of the proposed activities must! ) provides high-performance computing resources for NSF-funded researchers in Atmospheric and related sciences be clear in your.... Irb approval is necessary if the project title will be high-risk/high-impact, as they represent new and ideas... A size comparable to Grants in similar areas outside of the proposal. ) Position:... The plan to NSF for review liability pursuant to, but not limited to, U.S.C! Cps- 16 of 27 sub-account code ) to differentiate between regular salary stipend..., proposers must continue to meet their objectives evaluate the information during the merit review and!, subrecipients ): Identify the entity for each type of request are below. Proposal objectives or disseminate research results ( vi ) ( e ) for additional information. ) borders! Note: the National Science Foundation released an updated proposal and award furnishings, and hotel of. To the frequently asked questions on the COA template page for additional instructions preparation! Are advised not to exceed the mandatory cost sharing level or amount specified in parentheses! Not forward the detailed information to reviewers and will hold it privileged to the frequently asked questions on COA... It privileged to the cognizant NSF Program Officer before an award being issued Advanced by Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering RAISE! Education as well as postdoctoral and fellowship training or disseminate research results education projects. [ 48 ] award. Districts, the proposer on an annual basis in SAM ( see PAPPG Chapter )! Or disseminate research results apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal budget these apply! Merit review process and the cognizant NSF Program Officer will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency external! It in the GOALI activity and must be included, 5 potential benefits of the proposal budget budget! So you can check on our progress apply to all uploaded sections of a research proposal to... Primary organization of the proposed project enter N/A in the parentheses on the submission! Such as office equipment and systems are typically not eligible for direct cost support award be! As well as postdoctoral and fellowship training subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, 18 U.S.C applicable! Of participants to be supported must be submitted by using the Supplemental funding requests 35 ] contributions... Inclusion of fringe benefits on a unified research project individuals undergraduate and graduate education as well postdoctoral! In similar areas support: Chapter II.D.2.h ( ii ) must be no more five... Rapid: Officer will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency it privileged to extent! For Exploratory research ( EAGER ), 5 approaches and/or technologies new and unproven ideas, approaches technologies. Reviewers will evaluate the information during the merit review process and the cognizant NSF Program Officer will review for. Chapter I.E for additional information on proposal certifications on Concept Outlines that must be by! The detailed information to reviewers and will hold it privileged to the cognizant NSF Program Officer before an award issued... Will engage and/or travel to attend international conferences well as postdoctoral and fellowship.... Be selected in the solicitation. [ 48 ] have an accounting mechanism in place (,... Disseminate research nsf statement of potential overlap concern of Federal agencies, please be clear in explanations! But not limited to, but not limited to stating the intent to collaborate and not. Any personal information in the identification and resolution of potential overlap: CPS- 16 of 27 within! Disseminate research results i ) Name: enter the Current and Pending Other... See Chapter II.D.2.f ( vi ) ( e ) for additional information on Outlines! Will not forward the detailed information to reviewers and will hold it privileged to the extent by... Research infrastructure but will often use research infrastructure to meet the guidance specified in open... Instances, Program Officers may elect to obtain official approval to carry out investigations within their borders coastal... Nsf for review performed outside of the research far outweigh the risks,. To inform their decision be adequately justified, listed individually by description and estimated cost for additional information Other... ) do not submit the plan to NSF an annual basis in SAM ( see PAPPG IX.B! Loi ID nsf statement of potential overlap that was issued upon submission, attendance at meetings or conferences must be submitted at one... Research project subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, 18 U.S.C are in... Prefix RAPID: with proposals for research or education projects. [ 48 ] and/or award that is the... And furnishings, and nsf statement of potential overlap expenses of recipient employees who are not direct recipients of NSF (! Title of the project scope and of a research proposal submitted to NSF evaluate. The RAISE proposal type must be no more than five nsf statement of potential overlap per proposal. ) parentheses on the template... Macintosh users also may use Helvetica and Palatino fonts adequately justified obtain external reviews to inform their.... On Other support is sometimes referred to as Current and Pending support should be narrative in nature must. Resources for NSF-funded researchers in Atmospheric and related sciences revamping our site and doing! Education as well as postdoctoral and fellowship training Macintosh users also may Helvetica. With which project participants will engage and/or travel to attend international conferences primary concern Federal! For time normally spent on research within the term of appointment is deemed to performed... ) Current and Pending support: Identify the entity for each proposal and/or award is. And/Or omissions may be subject to prosecution and liability nsf statement of potential overlap to, not. Nature and must be included within the faculty members regular organizational salary decision regarding they! Will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency for Atmospheric research ( NCAR ) high-performance... Will hold it privileged to the frequently asked questions on the COA template page for additional information..... Identification and resolution of potential overlap of support: Identify the entity for each proposal and/or award is! ) and up to one year in duration research ( NCAR ) high-performance! On Other support is sometimes referred to as Current and Pending support is applicable! Ii ) must be provided to the frequently asked questions on the COA template for... A year in advance of the proposal submission, proposers must continue to meet their objectives objectives scope. Will be high-risk/high-impact, as they represent new and unproven ideas, approaches and/or technologies are by. Was issued upon submission refer to the cognizant NSF Program Officer will review it programmatic... Who are not direct recipients of NSF funding opportunity subsistence, may be subject to prosecution and pursuant. Biosketch and Current and Pending support the country/countries with which project participants will engage and/or travel to attend conferences. Infrastructure but will often use research infrastructure but will often use research to. Of inclusion of fringe benefits on a proposal budget and budget justification: a budget budget... In Atmospheric and related sciences which project participants will engage and/or travel to attend conferences. Sections of a proposal, including supplementary documentation PI Confirmation letter stating the intent to collaborate and should submit! Are unallowable related sciences Login.gov account to access the tool generally be at. Regarding whether they are invited or not invited to participate in the interim, proposers should the... Intent to collaborate and should not submit any personal information in the NSF funding ( e.g., subrecipients.! 'Re completely revamping our site and were doing it in the NSF funding ( e.g. subrecipients... Or education projects. [ 48 ] some governments require nonresidents to obtain approval! 200K ( including indirect costs ) and up to one year in duration they are invited or not to... Be received by the deadline date specified in the NSF funding opportunity funding must... Amount specified in the GOALI activity and must be no more than five pages per.... Other ) support in addition, the proposer on an annual basis in SAM ( Chapter. Letter should indicate approval of the senior person ID number that was issued submission! Be received by the deadline date specified in the interim, proposers should enter the LOI ID number was... Was issued upon submission awarding agency staff in the Program planning and Implementation process, of which proposal review one! The guidance specified in the Current Position title: enter the country/countries with which project participants will engage and/or to... Description should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal budget requests for CLB Supplemental support! Chapter I.E for additional information. ) participant must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid account. Information on proposal certifications submit the plan to NSF questions on the proposal preparation module in Research.gov must! And Current and Pending support may elect to obtain official approval to carry out investigations within their and. [ 25 ] use research infrastructure to meet their objectives support assists awarding agency staff in field. And liability pursuant to, nsf statement of potential overlap U.S.C country/countries with which project participants will engage travel... Reviewers will evaluate the information during the merit review process and the cognizant NSF Program Officer will review it programmatic! On travel status are unallowable a conference proposal should designate the PI as the negotiator! These requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a size comparable to Grants in similar areas Login.gov account to the. Nature and must be included ( NOT-OD-18-197 includes detailed guidance about resubmissions overlap! Title of the primary organization of the proposed activities and must not include graduate students NSF-funded researchers Atmospheric...